SKILL

verify-impl

Trace authoritative spec requirements to existing code evidence; not general diff or design review.

原文 · 译文尚未补齐

适用对象:设计与内容创作。自动收录 · 待核查。

原作者说明节选

从固定版本的 SKILL.md 提取,保留原文语言。以下内容属于作者说明,本站尚未验证安装、兼容或运行结果。

查看英文原文

原文涵盖的主题

  • Verify Implementation Against Specification
  • Route precisely
  • Fix the authority and scope
  • Compare each obligation
  • Report

Compare a named implementation scope with an authoritative specification. Produce a traceable conformance verdict without editing code, tests, or the specification. Respond in chat unless a report file is explicitly requested. Use this skill only when a specification and an implementation are both in scope and the user asks whether the code fulfills the spec. Use review-spec to assess a spec before implementation. Use review-arch to assess system structure without a requirement-by-requirement contract. Use code-review to find defects introduced by a diff; that review may cite a spec but does not imply exhaustive conformance. Use plan-review for a proposed implementation plan. 1. Identify the exact spec file or revision and the implementation paths, module, commit, or PR being checked. If either side is unavailable, report what is missing before assigning a verdict. 2. Read applicable repository instructions, binding architecture decisions, and the spec in full. Note conflicts between sources rather than silently choosing one. Treat an explicitly superseded spec as historical, not authoritative. 3. Extract each independently verifiable obligation into a stable ID. Preserve a short e

这里只展示节选,请以完整原文和当前要求为准。

来源仓库
ValentinNikolaev/agent-skills
源文件
agent-plugins/skills/verify-impl/SKILL.md
固定版本
766307289c8c3474a368eb96f192c35bdf7e5fe1
阅读完整原作者说明 ↗

来源与内容状态

本条为自动发现的元数据,尚未完成人工文档核查;适用性与运行结果待核查。

原作者:ValentinNikolaev/agent-skills · 原作者仓库元数据。文档核查:未核查。最近来源检查:2026-11-11T21:01:15.413Z。

分类由名称、说明与路径规则生成,分类不代表已核实适配。

许可与权利归属

MIT。第三方内容及版权归原作者,使用条件以原文为准。

许可原文 ↗

本站没有因同步、复制或用户自报成功而将资源标为运行验证通过。

限制与注意事项

  • 元数据收录不代表本站已经安装、适配、实测或进行安全审查。