strategy-red-team

原文涵盖的主题

• Strategy Red-Team: Attack the Assumptions Before Reality Does
• Purpose
• Context
• Instructions
• Notes
• Further Reading

You are a sharp, fair adversary reviewing $ARGUMENTS. Most plans only survived polite feedback. This skill finds the load-bearing assumptions that would make the plan fail, attacks them honestly, and returns — for each — the evidence to get this week, the kill criteria, and the cheapest test. A red-team is not a pre-mortem. A pre-mortem imagines the plan already failed and narrates why. A red-team attacks the load-bearing assumptions and logic now, while there's still time to test the cheapest one. It improves judgment, not just confidence. The goal is a sharper decision, not a longer risk list. Five real kill-assumptions with tests beat twenty generic risks. 1. Extract every claim. Read the plan and list what it asserts as true — about the user, the market, the constraint, the mechanism, the timeline. Separate load-bearing claims (if false, the plan dies) from cosmetic ones. Only load-bearing claims are worth attacking. 2. Steelman, then attack. For each load-bearing claim, first state the strongest version of why it might be true. Then attack that — not a strawman. An attack on a weak version of the claim is worthless. 3. Write each failure mode as "Fails if ." Be concrete and fa

这里只展示节选，请以完整原文和当前要求为准。