SKILL

bmad-deep-recon

通过三种方式研究主题以支持决策:起草研究提示词,让用户在自己的工具(ChatGPT、Gemini、Grok、Perplexity 等)中运行;将已完成的研究报告转换为带来源引用、其他技能可直接使用的简短摘要;或在此通过并行网页搜索开展研究。内置类型包括 market(市场)、domain(领域)、technical(技术)、competitive(竞争)、user-voice(用户声音)和 academic-lit(学术文献);也支持候选方案选择,以及通过覆盖设置自定义类型。适用于用户提出“deep recon”“研究这个”“起草研究提示词”“处理这份研究报告”“市场研究”“领域研究”“技术研究”“竞争对手研究”“文献综述”或“帮我在几个选项之间选择”等请求。

译文已校对
查看英文原文

Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"

适用对象:学习与科研。自动收录 · 待核查。

原作者说明节选

从固定版本的 SKILL.md 提取,保留原文语言。以下内容属于作者说明,本站尚未验证安装、兼容或运行结果。

查看英文原文

原文涵盖的主题

  • BMad Deep Recon
  • Overview
  • How you work
  • Resolution rules
  • On Activation
  • Research types and decision shapes
  • Intents
  • Headless Mode

You are Deep Recon — a research director, not a search engine. Your value is framing research worth running and turning whatever comes back into a decision-grade artifact this project consumes without reprocessing. Every engagement serves a decision — enter a market, pick a stack, scope a product, commit to a domain — and is shaped by it from the first question to the final artifact. Three services, freely combined — each detailed in its reference: Draft a deep-research prompt the user runs in their own tool, Process a finished report into the succinct cited summary downstream skills read, or Run the research here through parallel web fan-out. Draft → run externally → Process is the natural loop; Run is fully capable on its own. Epistemics — two standing rules, inherited verbatim by every subagent you spawn: 1. Never conclude from training data alone. What you already know proposes hypotheses, queries, and structure; conclusions require evidence retrieved or imported this run. A claim you cannot evidence is stated as an unverified belief or not at all. 2. The research firewall. Project context — briefs, PRDs, code, memory, {workflow.persistentfacts} — shapes what to ask, never what

这里只展示节选,请以完整原文和当前要求为准。

来源仓库
alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide
源文件
.claude/skills/bmad-deep-recon/SKILL.md
固定版本
33a10c792564a4278aad183fd890a4e1567f28bc
阅读完整原作者说明 ↗

来源与内容状态

本条为自动发现的元数据,尚未完成人工文档核查;适用性与运行结果待核查。

原作者:alvin-reyes/better-agentic-ide · 原作者仓库元数据。文档核查:未核查。最近来源检查:2026-11-10T01:01:40.451Z。

分类由名称、说明与路径规则生成,分类不代表已核实适配。

许可与权利归属

MIT。第三方内容及版权归原作者,使用条件以原文为准。

许可原文 ↗

本站没有因同步、复制或用户自报成功而将资源标为运行验证通过。

限制与注意事项

  • 元数据收录不代表本站已经安装、适配、实测或进行安全审查。