prompt-engineering
Design effective prompts for LLMs: role framing, structured output, chain-of-thought, few-shot, and evaluation. Use to get reliable model behavior.
原文 · 译文尚未补齐适用对象:设计与内容创作。自动收录 · 待核查。
原作者说明节选
从固定版本的 SKILL.md 提取,保留原文语言。以下内容属于作者说明,本站尚未验证安装、兼容或运行结果。
查看英文原文
原文涵盖的主题
- Prompt Engineering
- Quick Start
- When to Use
- Best Practices
- Framing
- Structured Output
- Reasoning
- Dependencies
Designing prompts that reliably steer LLM behavior. Getting consistent structured output from LLMs Reducing hallucinations in critical workflows Making prompts robust across models and versions Building prompts for agents and tools Give the model a clear role and task State constraints explicitly (format, length, tone) Provide context before asking the question Ask for one thing per prompt when possible Ask for JSON/YAML with a schema Use few-shot examples of the desired format Request self-checking: "validate your JSON before responding" Prefer responseformat/tools when the API supports them Use chain-of-thought for multi-step problems Ask for step-by-step reasoning before the final answer Keep reasoning separate from the final deliverable Avoid leaking internal reasoning into user-facing output 1. Define the task, expected output, and failure modes. 2. Write a role + constraints prompt; include an output schema. 3. Add 2-3 few-shot examples of the exact format. 4. For reasoning tasks, request step-by-step with separated final answer. 5. Test against a held-out set; measure accuracy and format compliance. 6. Iterate: add failing cases, tighten constraints, trim noise. 7. Version p
这里只展示节选,请以完整原文和当前要求为准。
- 来源仓库
- ssrjkk/agent-skills
- 源文件
- .claude/skills/ai/prompt-engineering/SKILL.md
- 固定版本
- 868975614072b553f929cb32c52c5e7dc4ba8734
来源与内容状态
本条为自动发现的元数据,尚未完成人工文档核查;适用性与运行结果待核查。
原作者:ssrjkk/agent-skills · 原作者仓库元数据。文档核查:未核查。最近来源检查:2026-11-11T03:01:42.181Z。
分类由名称、说明与路径规则生成,分类不代表已核实适配。
许可与权利归属
MIT。第三方内容及版权归原作者,使用条件以原文为准。
许可原文 ↗本站没有因同步、复制或用户自报成功而将资源标为运行验证通过。
限制与注意事项
- 元数据收录不代表本站已经安装、适配、实测或进行安全审查。