evidence-backed-analytical-writing

原文涵盖的主题

• Evidence-backed analytical writing
• Procedure
• Negative findings and evidence backfill
• Final-report sourcing style (简单出处)
• Multi-model draft iterations
• Always-on quality rules

Use this skill for Chinese analytical reports, policy briefs, capability assessments, and technical arguments that combine user-supplied claims with retrieved evidence. It complements grounded-citations: this skill governs claim hygiene, structure, and user-facing prose; grounded-citations governs the citation ledger and source rendering. 1. Normalize the brief. Extract the requested language, approximate length, section count, section symmetry, audience, required claims, and requested source recency. Preserve the requested point order and visible form: when the input uses “一是/二是/三是” analytical paragraphs, keep that numbered structure unless the user asks for a different format. Do not preserve an unsupported number as fact. Locate any project style contract (style/.md) before drafting and copy its bans into the QA checklist — contracts may forbid direct “我军” address (use 军队/相关力量) or require “要/应” imperatives in recommendation sections; contract wording overrides a prior draft's convention. 2. Set the recency boundary before searching. When the user asks for “最新/近期” data, establish a cutoff date, search current official releases first, and label older figures as trend baselines rat

这里只展示节选，请以完整原文和当前要求为准。