SKILL

think-tank

在规划或做出架构、设计、战略决策前,运行虚拟智库,即结构化的多角色辩论。用户准备规划系统、选择技术、评估取舍、决定方案,或任何可借助多视角改善结果的决策时使用。用户说“think tank”“debate this”“perspectives on”“trade-offs”“should I use X or Y”“help me decide”“before we plan”,或要求比较不同方案优缺点时也触发。必须在任何实现规划开始前运行,产出结构化分析以改进后续计划。

译文已校对
查看英文原文

Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.

适用对象:设计与内容创作。自动收录 · 待核查。

原作者说明节选

从固定版本的 SKILL.md 提取,保留原文语言。以下内容属于作者说明,本站尚未验证安装、兼容或运行结果。

查看英文原文

原文涵盖的主题

  • Virtual Think Tank
  • Why This Exists
  • How It Works
  • Running the Think Tank
  • Phase 1: Frame the Decision
  • Phase 2: Assemble the Panel
  • Phase 3: Run the Debate
  • Phase 4: Produce the Output

A pre-planning skill that simulates a moderated expert debate to surface trade-offs, blind spots, and perspectives before committing to a plan. Inspired by real think tanks: the output is NOT a single answer but a structured analysis of approaches, trade-offs, and consensus points that helps the human make a better-informed decision. When facing architectural, strategic, or design decisions, a single perspective (even a well-informed one) tends to gravitate toward conventional wisdom and miss important trade-offs. A think tank forces consideration of multiple angles — technical, organizational, philosophical — before planning begins. The result is plans that account for more of reality. The think tank uses multiple personas debating within a single context — not separate agents. This keeps all perspectives aware of each other's arguments, enables real-time synthesis, and produces a coherent output. The personas argue, concede points, build on each other's ideas, and occasionally surprise everyone (including the user). Before assembling the panel, clearly understand what's being decided. Ask the user (if not already clear): 1. What is the decision or problem? (e.g., "monolith vs mic

这里只展示节选,请以完整原文和当前要求为准。

来源仓库
davila7/claude-code-templates
源文件
cli-tool/components/skills/productivity/think-tank/SKILL.md
固定版本
21be197f100a12b8d0dd9a211cc244c8179f84d3
阅读完整原作者说明 ↗

准备条件

  • 本条仅收录原作者的技能元数据;请阅读完整说明,确认依赖、许可与使用条件。

第一件可以尝试的小事

先阅读原作者说明,再决定是否在自己的 AI 工具中使用。

对应 AI 工具说明

作者有说明不等于本站实机验证。没有证据时,不自动标为兼容、安全或免费。

来源与内容状态

本条为自动发现的元数据,尚未完成人工文档核查;适用性与运行结果待核查。

原作者:davila7/claude-code-templates · 原作者仓库元数据。文档核查:未核查。最近来源检查:2026-11-09T15:01:39.812Z。

分类由名称、说明与路径规则生成,分类不代表已核实适配。

许可与权利归属

MIT。第三方内容及版权归原作者,使用条件以原文为准。

许可原文 ↗

本站没有因同步、复制或用户自报成功而将资源标为运行验证通过。

限制与注意事项

  • 元数据收录不代表本站已经安装、适配、实测或进行安全审查。