meeting-postbrief
Write a Meeting Postbrief, a one-page findings sheet sent after a technical meeting - the shared vocabulary the discussion needed, what was proposed and what it will and will not deliver against the real need, and concrete ways forward with named techniques and workday estimates. Use whenever someone asks for "a postbrief", "a findings sheet", "a cheat sheet from the meeting", "my notes with ways forward", "something to send the team after the call", or wants to turn a meeting (transcript, chat, slides, live notes) into a decision-ready one-pager for attendees; also offer one after any technical meeting where people talked past each other on terms, a plan was presented, or options were left open. Not for minutes or a full meeting summary (relevant-transcripts conventions) or a pre-meeting brief.
原文 · 译文尚未补齐适用对象:演示文稿。自动收录 · 待核查。
原作者说明节选
从固定版本的 SKILL.md 提取,保留原文语言。以下内容属于作者说明,本站尚未验证安装、兼容或运行结果。
查看英文原文
原文涵盖的主题
- Meeting Postbrief
- Inputs, gather all of them first
- The three sections, always in this order
- Style
- Build and deliver
A Meeting Postbrief is the one page you send attendees after a technical meeting. Minutes record what was said; a postbrief records what it means and what we could do next. Write one when people are using terms interchangeably, a plan is being taken as the answer to a different question, or a lead needs to decide where to spend. An illustrative example, with its rendered page, is references/example-postbrief.md and assets/example-postbrief.pdf. It earns its place when the meeting had at least one of: words used loosely, a plan presented, a decision left open. If it had none, send a summary instead. The raw transcript (Teams/Plaud) and its summary, if one exists. The meeting chat (links, papers, code and data people pasted are often the real content). Slides or screenshots shown, and any live notes taken during the call. The project's own record: what the program actually needs (requirements, success criteria, the larger system this piece sits in). The postbrief judges the plan against that, not against what the presenter said it was for. Quote people only with words the transcript shows. Mark anything from your own knowledge (figures, product accuracies, method claims) as unverifie
这里只展示节选,请以完整原文和当前要求为准。
- 来源仓库
- Lmandrake/MandrakeWorkflows
- 源文件
- skills/meeting-postbrief/SKILL.md
- 固定版本
- 1874105936272447e2f9c81ba1dac48dae6ed074
准备条件
- 本条仅收录原作者的技能元数据;请阅读完整说明,确认依赖、许可与使用条件。
第一件可以尝试的小事
先阅读原作者说明,再决定是否在自己的 AI 工具中使用。
对应 AI 工具说明
作者有说明不等于本站实机验证。没有证据时,不自动标为兼容、安全或免费。
来源与内容状态
本条为自动发现的元数据,尚未完成人工文档核查;适用性与运行结果待核查。
原作者:Lmandrake/MandrakeWorkflows · 原作者仓库元数据。文档核查:未核查。最近来源检查:2026-11-11T03:01:44.687Z。
分类由名称、说明与路径规则生成,分类不代表已核实适配。
许可与权利归属
MIT。第三方内容及版权归原作者,使用条件以原文为准。
许可原文 ↗本站没有因同步、复制或用户自报成功而将资源标为运行验证通过。
限制与注意事项
- 元数据收录不代表本站已经安装、适配、实测或进行安全审查。