okhp3-equilibrium-review

原文涵盖的主题

• okhp3-equilibrium-review
• Scope
• Contract
• Role boundaries
• Execution
• Safety
• Routing and validation
• About

Use this skill when an artifact needs an evidence-backed answer to “is it supported, safe, useful, and ready within its stated scope?” The equilibrium metaphor is an operating model, not a claim of formal Nash computation. In scope: evidence-led artifact and release review. Out of scope: invented evidence, autonomous publication, and specialist authority. 1. Freeze the artifact version, question, criteria, source set, and review record before judging it. 2. Require a claim/evidence ledger. Missing evidence is defer-for-evidence, never agreement by confidence, polish, or vote count. 3. Run three independent roles: evidence, outcome, and safety/portability. Record shared model, source, context, tool, and permission limitations. 4. If those roles materially disagree, run the negotiator. If they materially agree, run a narrow disruptor that supplies falsifiable objections and a test that could prove each objection wrong, then run the negotiator. 5. Release only approve, approve-with-limits, defer-for-evidence, or reject, with rationale, limitations, evidence status, owner, and expiry. 6. Never claim perfection, live quality, statistical significance, or holdout success without that evi

这里只展示节选，请以完整原文和当前要求为准。