designing-logic-models

Topics in the source

• Designing logic models
• Contents
• Constraints
• Quick start
• Workflow
• Related skills
• Verification
• References

Guides teams through an interactive conversation to construct, stress-test, and document robust causal results chains—from resources and activities through controllable outputs to progressive immediate, intermediate, and long-term public outcomes. Constraints Quick start Workflow Verification References 1. Strict causal purity: Rigorously separate activities (work done), outputs (things produced), and outcomes (behavioral or operational changes resulting from use). 2. Intermediate stepping: Reject unmediated leaps from early outputs to macro impacts without immediate and intermediate stepping stones. 3. Attribution vs. contribution: Direct control applies only to outputs; long-term outcomes must be framed as contribution alongside external influences. 4. Guided interaction: Guide the user step by step with questions, following guided-interaction.md: open with a numbered menu or one question, ask 1–2 per turn with a recommended default, show progress, accept "I don't know" as an open item, and confirm a recap before every write. 5. B.C. Government style: Use sentence case, plain language, zero emoji, zero exclamation marks, and official BC Gov token hex colors in Mermaid diagrams. 1

This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.