peer-review

Topics in the source

• Scientific Critical Evaluation and Peer Review
• Overview
• When to Use This Skill
• Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
• Peer Review Workflow
• Stage 1: Initial Assessment
• Stage 2: Detailed Section-by-Section Review
• Abstract and Title

Peer review is a systematic process for evaluating scientific manuscripts. Assess methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards. Apply this skill for manuscript and grant review across disciplines with constructive, rigorous evaluation. This skill should be used when: Conducting peer review of scientific manuscripts for journals Evaluating grant proposals and research applications Assessing methodology and experimental design rigor Reviewing statistical analyses and reporting standards Evaluating reproducibility and data availability Checking compliance with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA) Providing constructive feedback on scientific writing When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication. If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams: Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to vi

This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.