visual-portfolio
Divergent orchestrator: given one problem, produce a small portfolio of genuinely-different visualizations — each answering a DIFFERENT analytical question about the same data, each individually valid, each shipped with a trade-off card. Use when the ask is "show me the alternatives / what are the ways to look at this / a few views of X", or whenever a single figure would hide legitimate competing readings. Runs generate → validate → select → characterize. It sits ON TOP OF visual-critic (which validates and scores each member); it does not replace or duplicate the single-figure machinery.
Target: Target not categorized. Automatically collected · unverified.
Excerpt from the author’s documentation
Extracted from a fixed version of SKILL.md in its original language. This is the author’s documentation; installation, compatibility and runtime results have not been verified by this site.
Read the original English text
Topics in the source
- Visual Portfolio (divergent orchestrator)
- Purpose
- When to invoke
- Inputs
- Required intermediate representation
- Procedure — generate → validate → select → characterize
- Graceful degradation (honesty over quota)
- The trade-off card (per member)
Turn one problem into a Pareto set of distinct, valid views rather than one "best" figure. Where visual-critic converges to the single strongest honest figure, this skill diverges: it enumerates the analytical questions the data can honestly answer, builds the best figure for each, keeps only the valid ones, and selects the few that together give the reader the most complete, non-redundant understanding of the stated decision. Each member ships a trade-off card, so three pictures become three arguments. The single failure mode this skill exists to prevent: variety without contribution — three chart-form swaps of the same question masquerading as a portfolio. Diversity here is defined over analytical questions (principles/analyticalquestions.yaml), never over chart types. The user asks for alternatives, options, "a few ways to see this," or an exploration rather than a single verdict. A single figure would suppress a legitimate competing reading (multiple decision-relevant questions live in one dataset). Building an exploratory panel, a "choose-your-view" page, or a section that must serve more than one audience/question at once. NOT for a single-figure deliverable with one clear qu
This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.
- Source repository
- Lmandrake/MandrakeWorkflows
- Source file
- skills/visual-portfolio/SKILL.md
- Fixed revision
- 1874105936272447e2f9c81ba1dac48dae6ed074
Sources and evidence
This record was collected automatically. Its documentation, suitability and runtime behavior have not been manually verified.
Author: Lmandrake/MandrakeWorkflows · original repository metadata. Documentation review: Not reviewed. Last source check: 2026-11-11T03:01:44.755Z.
Categories are inferred from names, descriptions and paths. They do not establish compatibility.
License and attribution
MIT. Third-party content and copyright remain with their authors. Refer to the original license and terms.
Original license ↗Synchronization, copying and user-reported success do not mark a resource as runtime-tested.
Limitations and notes
- Collecting metadata does not mean this site has installed, adapted, runtime-tested or security-reviewed the resource.