red-green-proof
Turns a suspected bug into a proven one. Verify the cause against reality before claiming it, write a test that FAILS on the current code, apply the fix, watch it pass — then revert the fix and confirm the test goes red again, because a test that passes both ways proves nothing. Invoked bare after a debugging conversation, it takes the target from context rather than asking. Use when fixing a bug, investigating an incident, hardening a flaky area, or when asked to "add tests that reveal the bug". Triggers on "/red-green-proof", "prove the bug", "red-green", "make the test fail first", "is that test load-bearing", "reveal the bug with a test".
Target: Software development & testing. Automatically collected · unverified.
Excerpt from the author’s documentation
Extracted from a fixed version of SKILL.md in its original language. This is the author’s documentation; installation, compatibility and runtime results have not been verified by this site.
Read the original English text
Topics in the source
- Red-Green-Proof
- Overview
- Workflow
- Proactive Triggers
- Output Format
- Picking the target
- The loop
- 1. Verify the cause. Do not infer it.
A bug is not fixed because the tests pass. A bug is fixed when a test fails without your fix and passes with it, and you have watched it do both. Use this skill when a bug, incident, flaky test, or unproven regression test is under investigation. It applies a strict red-green-red loop: establish the cause, observe a focused test fail, make the smallest fix, then remove the fix and observe the test fail again. The final revert is the proof that the test is actually coupled to the defect. Keep evidence for each phase separate. A test command that exits zero is not evidence that it exercised the defect; record the assertion and the observed failure or success. Do not proceed when the current phase is unobserved. Before changing code, identify the exact test command and expected red signal. After the fix, run that same command without changing its assertions. During the revert, use the same command again and preserve the failure output. Restore the fix before running the broader suite. A pull request adds a regression test but no pre-fix failure is recorded → ask for the red run before calling it coverage. A bug fix changes production code and tests in one step → verify the test fails
This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.
- Source repository
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- Source file
- engineering-team/skills/red-green-proof/SKILL.md
- Fixed revision
- 8f082544116fc0d014188e521ca40304cdfc86b0
Requirements
- Only the author’s Skill metadata is included. Read the full instructions to check dependencies, licensing and conditions of use.
A small first task
先阅读原作者说明,再决定是否在自己的 AI 工具中使用。
Instructions for your AI tool
- Claude Desktop: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Claude Code: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Cursor: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Codex: resource-specific guide not available yet
Author documentation is not live verification by this site. Without evidence, we do not mark a resource as compatible, safe or free.
Sources and evidence
This record was collected automatically. Its documentation, suitability and runtime behavior have not been manually verified.
Author: alirezarezvani/claude-skills · original repository metadata. Documentation review: Not reviewed. Last source check: 2026-11-09T14:01:46.452Z.
Categories are inferred from names, descriptions and paths. They do not establish compatibility.
License and attribution
MIT. Third-party content and copyright remain with their authors. Refer to the original license and terms.
Original license ↗Synchronization, copying and user-reported success do not mark a resource as runtime-tested.
Limitations and notes
- Collecting metadata does not mean this site has installed, adapted, runtime-tested or security-reviewed the resource.