bmad-review

Topics in the source

• BMad Review
• Inputs
• Conventions
• Execution
• Output

Review content through lenses — each a distinct method and stance — and report findings in one canonical shape. Report what is real — never pad to look thorough. Each lens sets its own stance toward the content and toward zero findings: for most an empty result is valid; the adversarial lens requires at least ten concrete findings and treats an empty list as a signal to re-check; the editorial lenses hold content sacrosanct and critique only how it is organized and expressed. The lens set is whatever {workflow.lenses} resolves to, not a fixed list — overrides add lenses and replace shipped ones. Never claim a capability from this file; read the resolved lenses and work from those. content — what to review: a diff, branch, uncommitted changes, file, spec, story, or any document. Args: [path]. lenses (optional) — one or more lens codes or names, however the caller expresses them: a spoken request, or a directive of the form skill:bmad-review lenses= [, ...] (the form bmm's docstandards uses). Default: every applicable lens (a full review). alsoconsider (optional) — areas to keep in mind alongside each lens's normal analysis. claims (optional) — the change's own narrative: the commit

This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.