access-lifecycle
Use when preparing or running a user access review, checking that leavers lost their access, finding orphaned or ownerless service accounts, answering an auditor's access-control request for SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA or NIST 800-53, or checking whether a finished review campaign will hold up. Diffs the HR roster against account exports, tests the campaign for coverage, self-review, unremoved revokes and rubber-stamping, and maps every exception to the controls it breaks.
Target: Marketing & growth. Automatically collected · unverified.
Excerpt from the author’s documentation
Extracted from a fixed version of SKILL.md in its original language. This is the author’s documentation; installation, compatibility and runtime results have not been verified by this site.
Read the original English text
Topics in the source
- Access Lifecycle
- Workflow
- The gates block on (exit 4)
- Hard rules
- Scripts
- References and assets
Portability: 3 stdlib scripts, no network, no IdP or HR connection. Export CSV, run, keep the output as evidence. Not audit advice. Periods and thresholds are your policy; the scripts make you state them. Access reviews fail audits in four ordinary ways: the review ran on an incomplete export, someone approved their own access, a revoke was decided and never carried out, and leavers kept working accounts nobody looked at. Each script catches one class of these before the auditor does. Step 1 joins each account to the roster on employee ID, then email. A terminated person with an enabled account is a blocker; one who logged in after their exit date is a worse one. Accounts that match nobody are orphans; service accounts need a named owner. Inactivity and privileged-review age use your periods. Step 2 checks the campaign against the export it was built from. An enabled account missing from the campaign means the review did not cover the population, whatever the sign-off sheet says. It also catches undecided lines, self-review, revokes not removed inside your window, late decisions, and a reviewer who kept every line of a large batch at machine speed. Step 3 turns findings into a per-
This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.
- Source repository
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- Source file
- ra-qm-team/access-lifecycle/skills/access-lifecycle/SKILL.md
- Fixed revision
- 8f082544116fc0d014188e521ca40304cdfc86b0
Requirements
- Only the author’s Skill metadata is included. Read the full instructions to check dependencies, licensing and conditions of use.
A small first task
先阅读原作者说明,再决定是否在自己的 AI 工具中使用。
Instructions for your AI tool
- Claude Desktop: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Claude Code: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Cursor: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Codex: resource-specific guide not available yet
Author documentation is not live verification by this site. Without evidence, we do not mark a resource as compatible, safe or free.
Sources and evidence
This record was collected automatically. Its documentation, suitability and runtime behavior have not been manually verified.
Author: alirezarezvani/claude-skills · original repository metadata. Documentation review: Not reviewed. Last source check: 2026-11-09T14:01:47.445Z.
Categories are inferred from names, descriptions and paths. They do not establish compatibility.
License and attribution
MIT. Third-party content and copyright remain with their authors. Refer to the original license and terms.
Original license ↗Synchronization, copying and user-reported success do not mark a resource as runtime-tested.
Limitations and notes
- Collecting metadata does not mean this site has installed, adapted, runtime-tested or security-reviewed the resource.