vpe-review
Challenge a plan on delivery speed, eng hiring, team structure or on-call. Use when asked or /c-level-agents:vpe-review.
Target: Target not categorized. Automatically collected · unverified.
Excerpt from the author’s documentation
Extracted from a fixed version of SKILL.md in its original language. This is the author’s documentation; installation, compatibility and runtime results have not been verified by this site.
Read the original English text
Topics in the source
- /c-level-agents:vpe-review — VPE Forcing Questions
- When to Run
- The Six VPE Questions
- 1. What's the cycle time, and where does work wait?
- 2. What's the DORA performance level on all 4 metrics?
- 3. Where is the hiring funnel leaking?
- 4. Is the team structure healthy for the headcount?
- 5. What's the production discipline maturity?
Command: /c-level-agents:vpe-review The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change. Before quarterly delivery commitment (sprint planning, OKR review) Before approving an eng hiring plan Before restructuring eng teams (splitting/merging squads, adding tribes) Before deciding whether to hire a VPE separately from CTO (or merge them) When production incidents are increasing When sprint velocity is dropping but everyone says "we're working hard" No DORA, no diagnosis. Lead Time for Changes is the single best health metric If you can't decompose cycle time into stages, you can't fix the bottleneck Run deliverythroughputanalyzer.py One Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy. Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, MTTR, Change Failure Rate The worst metric defines overall level Fix lead time first; everything else follows "Can't find good engineers" is wrong. Specific stage is over-filtering OR top-of-funnel volume is too low OR offer-to-accept is broken Run enghiringfunnelcalculator.py If offer-to-accept 50% on management vs strategy
This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.
- Source repository
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills
- Source file
- c-level-agents/skills/vpe-review/SKILL.md
- Fixed revision
- 8f082544116fc0d014188e521ca40304cdfc86b0
Requirements
- Only the author’s Skill metadata is included. Read the full instructions to check dependencies, licensing and conditions of use.
A small first task
先阅读原作者说明,再决定是否在自己的 AI 工具中使用。
Instructions for your AI tool
- Claude Desktop: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Claude Code: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Cursor: resource-specific guide not available yet
- Codex: resource-specific guide not available yet
Author documentation is not live verification by this site. Without evidence, we do not mark a resource as compatible, safe or free.
Sources and evidence
This record was collected automatically. Its documentation, suitability and runtime behavior have not been manually verified.
Author: alirezarezvani/claude-skills · original repository metadata. Documentation review: Not reviewed. Last source check: 2026-11-09T14:01:46.254Z.
Categories are inferred from names, descriptions and paths. They do not establish compatibility.
License and attribution
MIT. Third-party content and copyright remain with their authors. Refer to the original license and terms.
Original license ↗Synchronization, copying and user-reported success do not mark a resource as runtime-tested.
Limitations and notes
- Collecting metadata does not mean this site has installed, adapted, runtime-tested or security-reviewed the resource.