okhp3-murderbird-argument-audit

Topics in the source

• MurderBird Argument Audit
• Scope
• Modes
• Procedure
• Output contract
• Rules
• About

OverKill Hill P³ · overkillhill.com · github.com/OKHP3 Find what doesn't hold before a reader does. The first draft is ore, not steel. This skill applies pressure to an argument and reports, in a fixed order, what carries weight, what fails first, and what is worth keeping. Use for any owner-supplied draft headed for an audience: LinkedIn articles or posts, essays, manifestos, proposals, and position pieces. The draft must be supplied in full. Do not audit a summary of a draft. Not for: security or agentic-threat analysis (red-teaming/), final voice passes (okhp3-linkedin-voice), or publishing. | Mode | Trigger | Depth | |---|---|---| | Sentinel (default) | "red-team this", "does this hold" | Top findings only, clear verdict | | Furnace | "put it through the furnace", "tear it down" | Every claim, hinge, and hidden loop, ranked by what breaks first | | Salvage | "what's worth keeping" | Skip the teardown; extract load-bearing parts for a rebuild | 1. Read the whole draft before judging any part of it. 2. State the thesis in one sentence. If you can't, that is finding one. 3. List every load-bearing claim: statements the argument collapses without. 4. Classify each claim with okhp3-

This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.