build-evidence-map

Topics in the source

• Build Evidence Map
• Workflow
• Quality gates
• Deliver the result

Turn one contested question into a portable decision artifact that shows what supports the current position, what pushes against it, and what remains unknown. Do not use a graph to decorate an answer that has not been sourced. For a simple factual claim or a general fact-checking request, use a verification workflow such as doublecheck instead. Use this skill when the relationships between evidence, intermediate claims, trade-offs, and missing facts matter. 1. Frame one decision. Write one falsifiable question and one provisional position. Narrow the question until a reader can identify what action or belief the map is testing. 2. Collect bounded source regions. Prefer direct observations and primary sources. Record the URL or absolute local path, publisher, publication date, retrieval date, section/page/line/timestamp locator, and a short checkable excerpt. Read references/evidence-ladder.md when source quality is disputed. 3. Atomize the reasoning. Create only four node types: position: the single current verdict; claim: an intermediate proposition; evidence: a faithful statement of one source region; unknown: a specific missing fact that could change the verdict. 4. Type every e

This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.