okhp3-equilibrium-review

Topics in the source

• okhp3-equilibrium-review
• Scope
• Contract
• Role boundaries
• Execution
• Safety
• Routing and validation
• About

Use this skill when an artifact needs an evidence-backed answer to “is it supported, safe, useful, and ready within its stated scope?” The equilibrium metaphor is an operating model, not a claim of formal Nash computation. In scope: evidence-led artifact and release review. Out of scope: invented evidence, autonomous publication, and specialist authority. 1. Freeze the artifact version, question, criteria, source set, and review record before judging it. 2. Require a claim/evidence ledger. Missing evidence is defer-for-evidence, never agreement by confidence, polish, or vote count. 3. Run three independent roles: evidence, outcome, and safety/portability. Record shared model, source, context, tool, and permission limitations. 4. If those roles materially disagree, run the negotiator. If they materially agree, run a narrow disruptor that supplies falsifiable objections and a test that could prove each objection wrong, then run the negotiator. 5. Release only approve, approve-with-limits, defer-for-evidence, or reject, with rationale, limitations, evidence status, owner, and expiry. 6. Never claim perfection, live quality, statistical significance, or holdout success without that evi

This is an excerpt. Refer to the complete source and its current requirements.